Home › Forums › Closed Forums › Properties or Areas › 5924 Shaw Lopez Row – $3.2 mil
- This topic has 122 replies, 16 voices, and was last updated 11 years, 7 months ago by
SD Squatter.
-
AuthorPosts
-
June 23, 2011 at 8:35 PM #706925June 24, 2011 at 9:33 AM #705802
briansd1
Guest[quote=AN]
Those houses are just out of place and out of priced for the area. No way they can get $3.2M for those. For $3.2M, either you have to have ocean view for that kind of buildable land for a multi-acre in RSF with much bigger house than 3900 sq-ft. Even if they have the financial wherewithal, do they have the time wherewithal? I would guess they’d have to wait another 60-80 years to get $3.2M for each of those house.[/quote]Yeah, I agree.
If you look at that tax records for the houses on that street, $1 million is about right, value wise.
That’s why I said that $1.5 million is the max if one really likes the house and wanted to pay a premium for that area.
$3.2 million is crazy, for sure.
June 24, 2011 at 9:33 AM #705898Guest[quote=AN]
Those houses are just out of place and out of priced for the area. No way they can get $3.2M for those. For $3.2M, either you have to have ocean view for that kind of buildable land for a multi-acre in RSF with much bigger house than 3900 sq-ft. Even if they have the financial wherewithal, do they have the time wherewithal? I would guess they’d have to wait another 60-80 years to get $3.2M for each of those house.[/quote]Yeah, I agree.
If you look at that tax records for the houses on that street, $1 million is about right, value wise.
That’s why I said that $1.5 million is the max if one really likes the house and wanted to pay a premium for that area.
$3.2 million is crazy, for sure.
June 24, 2011 at 9:33 AM #706496Guest[quote=AN]
Those houses are just out of place and out of priced for the area. No way they can get $3.2M for those. For $3.2M, either you have to have ocean view for that kind of buildable land for a multi-acre in RSF with much bigger house than 3900 sq-ft. Even if they have the financial wherewithal, do they have the time wherewithal? I would guess they’d have to wait another 60-80 years to get $3.2M for each of those house.[/quote]Yeah, I agree.
If you look at that tax records for the houses on that street, $1 million is about right, value wise.
That’s why I said that $1.5 million is the max if one really likes the house and wanted to pay a premium for that area.
$3.2 million is crazy, for sure.
June 24, 2011 at 9:33 AM #706647Guest[quote=AN]
Those houses are just out of place and out of priced for the area. No way they can get $3.2M for those. For $3.2M, either you have to have ocean view for that kind of buildable land for a multi-acre in RSF with much bigger house than 3900 sq-ft. Even if they have the financial wherewithal, do they have the time wherewithal? I would guess they’d have to wait another 60-80 years to get $3.2M for each of those house.[/quote]Yeah, I agree.
If you look at that tax records for the houses on that street, $1 million is about right, value wise.
That’s why I said that $1.5 million is the max if one really likes the house and wanted to pay a premium for that area.
$3.2 million is crazy, for sure.
June 24, 2011 at 9:33 AM #707011Guest[quote=AN]
Those houses are just out of place and out of priced for the area. No way they can get $3.2M for those. For $3.2M, either you have to have ocean view for that kind of buildable land for a multi-acre in RSF with much bigger house than 3900 sq-ft. Even if they have the financial wherewithal, do they have the time wherewithal? I would guess they’d have to wait another 60-80 years to get $3.2M for each of those house.[/quote]Yeah, I agree.
If you look at that tax records for the houses on that street, $1 million is about right, value wise.
That’s why I said that $1.5 million is the max if one really likes the house and wanted to pay a premium for that area.
$3.2 million is crazy, for sure.
June 24, 2011 at 9:38 AM #705812Guest[quote=familyguy]These remind me of OBL’s compound in Pakistan.[/quote]
You’d be surprised at some of those compounds. For example, the riads in the Medina of Marraresh are pretty extraordinary.
Not every house needs to look like an America prairie house with a lawn up front.
I actually prefer European style houses with fencing and gates at the front. That provides more privacy for the residents.
June 24, 2011 at 9:38 AM #705908Guest[quote=familyguy]These remind me of OBL’s compound in Pakistan.[/quote]
You’d be surprised at some of those compounds. For example, the riads in the Medina of Marraresh are pretty extraordinary.
Not every house needs to look like an America prairie house with a lawn up front.
I actually prefer European style houses with fencing and gates at the front. That provides more privacy for the residents.
June 24, 2011 at 9:38 AM #706506Guest[quote=familyguy]These remind me of OBL’s compound in Pakistan.[/quote]
You’d be surprised at some of those compounds. For example, the riads in the Medina of Marraresh are pretty extraordinary.
Not every house needs to look like an America prairie house with a lawn up front.
I actually prefer European style houses with fencing and gates at the front. That provides more privacy for the residents.
June 24, 2011 at 9:38 AM #706657Guest[quote=familyguy]These remind me of OBL’s compound in Pakistan.[/quote]
You’d be surprised at some of those compounds. For example, the riads in the Medina of Marraresh are pretty extraordinary.
Not every house needs to look like an America prairie house with a lawn up front.
I actually prefer European style houses with fencing and gates at the front. That provides more privacy for the residents.
June 24, 2011 at 9:38 AM #707021Guest[quote=familyguy]These remind me of OBL’s compound in Pakistan.[/quote]
You’d be surprised at some of those compounds. For example, the riads in the Medina of Marraresh are pretty extraordinary.
Not every house needs to look like an America prairie house with a lawn up front.
I actually prefer European style houses with fencing and gates at the front. That provides more privacy for the residents.
June 24, 2011 at 2:17 PM #705867Fearful
Participant[quote=kcal09]You pay a premium for the unique design-a piece of art so to speak. It is only for conaisseurs…[/quote]
But it’s not unique! There are three nearly identical, side by side. That’s the worst part.June 24, 2011 at 2:17 PM #705962Participant[quote=kcal09]You pay a premium for the unique design-a piece of art so to speak. It is only for conaisseurs…[/quote]
But it’s not unique! There are three nearly identical, side by side. That’s the worst part.June 24, 2011 at 2:17 PM #706561Participant[quote=kcal09]You pay a premium for the unique design-a piece of art so to speak. It is only for conaisseurs…[/quote]
But it’s not unique! There are three nearly identical, side by side. That’s the worst part.June 24, 2011 at 2:17 PM #706712Participant[quote=kcal09]You pay a premium for the unique design-a piece of art so to speak. It is only for conaisseurs…[/quote]
But it’s not unique! There are three nearly identical, side by side. That’s the worst part. -
AuthorPosts
- The forum ‘Properties or Areas’ is closed to new topics and replies.