$500k and 33years old, when is enough enough?

[NotCranky]

[quote=jstoesz]I am homesick for MN, although I have not lived there for a decade.

I am headed south for Christmas, back with my wife and dog, loading up the rest of our stuff, and heading for the mountains. So my banishment is only for a couple more days!

BG will appreciate this…we have a cabin with some friends rented in June lake for new years![/quote]
Sounds good.Have a great time.

[jstoesz]

[quote=UCGal]Dooh – I have an extended family member that is doing what you’re talking about. He has a paid off house in Philadelphia. He’s very good at living on the cheap.

He’s figured out the system – if he makes less than $8000/year he gets free health insurance and some other benefits (I think food stamps.) Over the past several years he’s had part time jobs that kept him under that wage threshold. Then he volunteered to be laid off so he could collect unemployment.

This is an able bodied guy. He’s always claiming poverty – but he also won’t get a job that might impact his free benefits.

I’m for a social safety net – but what he’s doing is abuse.

FWIW – he’s not the stereotype welfare queen – he’s male, white, college educated, listens to Rush and Glenn and watches Fox News only… The hypocrisy drives me nuts. But you can’t pick family.

I don’t have a problem with people figuring out how to retire early, spend more time with their kids. I’ve been part time since my oldest was born. My husband will be retired when the kids are teenagers. But if you’re able bodied, able to work, can get a job, but choose to sponge off the system… I reserve the right to think of you as a loser.[/quote]

I am not sure if he is hypocritical yet…would he vote to reduce the social safety net? Would he like to see welfare reform, and medicaid reform? Real reform btw, the kind that hurts. Or is he really all talk? Looks to me just another outcome in the law of unintended consequences. To me the real immortality is that we have a society that fosters this kind of behavior (California first and foremost).

Now what is hypocritical and drives me up the wall to no end is all the seniors who weep with Mr. Beck, but would murder any republican who dares to reform their SS (welfare). Now that is hypocrisy, talk about welfare queens.

[jstoesz]

[quote=UCGal]Dooh – I have an extended family member that is doing what you’re talking about. He has a paid off house in Philadelphia. He’s very good at living on the cheap.

He’s figured out the system – if he makes less than $8000/year he gets free health insurance and some other benefits (I think food stamps.) Over the past several years he’s had part time jobs that kept him under that wage threshold. Then he volunteered to be laid off so he could collect unemployment.

This is an able bodied guy. He’s always claiming poverty – but he also won’t get a job that might impact his free benefits.

I’m for a social safety net – but what he’s doing is abuse.

FWIW – he’s not the stereotype welfare queen – he’s male, white, college educated, listens to Rush and Glenn and watches Fox News only… The hypocrisy drives me nuts. But you can’t pick family.

I don’t have a problem with people figuring out how to retire early, spend more time with their kids. I’ve been part time since my oldest was born. My husband will be retired when the kids are teenagers. But if you’re able bodied, able to work, can get a job, but choose to sponge off the system… I reserve the right to think of you as a loser.[/quote]

I am not sure if he is hypocritical yet…would he vote to reduce the social safety net? Would he like to see welfare reform, and medicaid reform? Real reform btw, the kind that hurts. Or is he really all talk? Looks to me just another outcome in the law of unintended consequences. To me the real immortality is that we have a society that fosters this kind of behavior (California first and foremost).

Now what is hypocritical and drives me up the wall to no end is all the seniors who weep with Mr. Beck, but would murder any republican who dares to reform their SS (welfare). Now that is hypocrisy, talk about welfare queens.

[jstoesz]

[quote=UCGal]Dooh – I have an extended family member that is doing what you’re talking about. He has a paid off house in Philadelphia. He’s very good at living on the cheap.

He’s figured out the system – if he makes less than $8000/year he gets free health insurance and some other benefits (I think food stamps.) Over the past several years he’s had part time jobs that kept him under that wage threshold. Then he volunteered to be laid off so he could collect unemployment.

This is an able bodied guy. He’s always claiming poverty – but he also won’t get a job that might impact his free benefits.

I’m for a social safety net – but what he’s doing is abuse.

FWIW – he’s not the stereotype welfare queen – he’s male, white, college educated, listens to Rush and Glenn and watches Fox News only… The hypocrisy drives me nuts. But you can’t pick family.

I don’t have a problem with people figuring out how to retire early, spend more time with their kids. I’ve been part time since my oldest was born. My husband will be retired when the kids are teenagers. But if you’re able bodied, able to work, can get a job, but choose to sponge off the system… I reserve the right to think of you as a loser.[/quote]

I am not sure if he is hypocritical yet…would he vote to reduce the social safety net? Would he like to see welfare reform, and medicaid reform? Real reform btw, the kind that hurts. Or is he really all talk? Looks to me just another outcome in the law of unintended consequences. To me the real immortality is that we have a society that fosters this kind of behavior (California first and foremost).

Now what is hypocritical and drives me up the wall to no end is all the seniors who weep with Mr. Beck, but would murder any republican who dares to reform their SS (welfare). Now that is hypocrisy, talk about welfare queens.

[jstoesz]

[quote=UCGal]Dooh – I have an extended family member that is doing what you’re talking about. He has a paid off house in Philadelphia. He’s very good at living on the cheap.

He’s figured out the system – if he makes less than $8000/year he gets free health insurance and some other benefits (I think food stamps.) Over the past several years he’s had part time jobs that kept him under that wage threshold. Then he volunteered to be laid off so he could collect unemployment.

This is an able bodied guy. He’s always claiming poverty – but he also won’t get a job that might impact his free benefits.

I’m for a social safety net – but what he’s doing is abuse.

FWIW – he’s not the stereotype welfare queen – he’s male, white, college educated, listens to Rush and Glenn and watches Fox News only… The hypocrisy drives me nuts. But you can’t pick family.

I don’t have a problem with people figuring out how to retire early, spend more time with their kids. I’ve been part time since my oldest was born. My husband will be retired when the kids are teenagers. But if you’re able bodied, able to work, can get a job, but choose to sponge off the system… I reserve the right to think of you as a loser.[/quote]

I am not sure if he is hypocritical yet…would he vote to reduce the social safety net? Would he like to see welfare reform, and medicaid reform? Real reform btw, the kind that hurts. Or is he really all talk? Looks to me just another outcome in the law of unintended consequences. To me the real immortality is that we have a society that fosters this kind of behavior (California first and foremost).

Now what is hypocritical and drives me up the wall to no end is all the seniors who weep with Mr. Beck, but would murder any republican who dares to reform their SS (welfare). Now that is hypocrisy, talk about welfare queens.

[jstoesz]

[quote=UCGal]Dooh – I have an extended family member that is doing what you’re talking about. He has a paid off house in Philadelphia. He’s very good at living on the cheap.

He’s figured out the system – if he makes less than $8000/year he gets free health insurance and some other benefits (I think food stamps.) Over the past several years he’s had part time jobs that kept him under that wage threshold. Then he volunteered to be laid off so he could collect unemployment.

This is an able bodied guy. He’s always claiming poverty – but he also won’t get a job that might impact his free benefits.

I’m for a social safety net – but what he’s doing is abuse.

FWIW – he’s not the stereotype welfare queen – he’s male, white, college educated, listens to Rush and Glenn and watches Fox News only… The hypocrisy drives me nuts. But you can’t pick family.

I don’t have a problem with people figuring out how to retire early, spend more time with their kids. I’ve been part time since my oldest was born. My husband will be retired when the kids are teenagers. But if you’re able bodied, able to work, can get a job, but choose to sponge off the system… I reserve the right to think of you as a loser.[/quote]

I am not sure if he is hypocritical yet…would he vote to reduce the social safety net? Would he like to see welfare reform, and medicaid reform? Real reform btw, the kind that hurts. Or is he really all talk? Looks to me just another outcome in the law of unintended consequences. To me the real immortality is that we have a society that fosters this kind of behavior (California first and foremost).

Now what is hypocritical and drives me up the wall to no end is all the seniors who weep with Mr. Beck, but would murder any republican who dares to reform their SS (welfare). Now that is hypocrisy, talk about welfare queens.

[scaredyclassic]

this is covered in THE FREEDOM MANIFESTO, but productivity is vastly overrated.

[scaredyclassic]

this is covered in THE FREEDOM MANIFESTO, but productivity is vastly overrated.

[scaredyclassic]

this is covered in THE FREEDOM MANIFESTO, but productivity is vastly overrated.

[scaredyclassic]

this is covered in THE FREEDOM MANIFESTO, but productivity is vastly overrated.

[scaredyclassic]

this is covered in THE FREEDOM MANIFESTO, but productivity is vastly overrated.

[jstoesz]

I am afraid if I read that book I will turn into a bigger more cynical bastard.

I swear Atlas shrugged was not a good influence on me, and the communist manifesto was like a BB bouncing off boiler plate.

[jstoesz]

I am afraid if I read that book I will turn into a bigger more cynical bastard.

I swear Atlas shrugged was not a good influence on me, and the communist manifesto was like a BB bouncing off boiler plate.

[jstoesz]

I am afraid if I read that book I will turn into a bigger more cynical bastard.

I swear Atlas shrugged was not a good influence on me, and the communist manifesto was like a BB bouncing off boiler plate.

[jstoesz]

I am afraid if I read that book I will turn into a bigger more cynical bastard.

I swear Atlas shrugged was not a good influence on me, and the communist manifesto was like a BB bouncing off boiler plate.

[Author]

Posts