Home › Forums › Financial Markets/Economics › $500k and 33years old, when is enough enough?
- This topic has 980 replies, 33 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 2 months ago by
svelte.
-
AuthorPosts
-
December 20, 2010 at 2:57 PM #643745December 20, 2010 at 3:02 PM #642646
jpinpb
Participant[quote=sdrealtor]Let’s just say most NYer’s are in state of graphic shock and disbelief after the loss my Eagles dropped on their Giants yesterday.[/quote]
I’m from NY and I still love Desean
December 20, 2010 at 3:02 PM #642718Participant[quote=sdrealtor]Let’s just say most NYer’s are in state of graphic shock and disbelief after the loss my Eagles dropped on their Giants yesterday.[/quote]
I’m from NY and I still love Desean
December 20, 2010 at 3:02 PM #643298Participant[quote=sdrealtor]Let’s just say most NYer’s are in state of graphic shock and disbelief after the loss my Eagles dropped on their Giants yesterday.[/quote]
I’m from NY and I still love Desean
December 20, 2010 at 3:02 PM #643434Participant[quote=sdrealtor]Let’s just say most NYer’s are in state of graphic shock and disbelief after the loss my Eagles dropped on their Giants yesterday.[/quote]
I’m from NY and I still love Desean
December 20, 2010 at 3:02 PM #643755Participant[quote=sdrealtor]Let’s just say most NYer’s are in state of graphic shock and disbelief after the loss my Eagles dropped on their Giants yesterday.[/quote]
I’m from NY and I still love Desean
December 20, 2010 at 3:08 PM #642641jstoesz
Participant[quote=NicMM]Jstoesz,
You really think “S. Californians are the least happy, and the most superficial of any place”? My friends visiting from New York really think that we are much happier here than people in New York and the houses here are much affordable than there.
I guess it all depends.
NicMM
[/quote]
No I do not think that, I should have added the qualifier, one of the least happy and most superficial. It has stiff competition from lots of other cities. LA, SF, NY would be obvious victors in this contest of crap.
BTW I am sure Barstow or detroit are are pretty unhappy places as well. My point was that most cities are happier healthier places for a fraction of the price. I apologize for overstating it.
December 20, 2010 at 3:08 PM #642713Participant[quote=NicMM]Jstoesz,
You really think “S. Californians are the least happy, and the most superficial of any place”? My friends visiting from New York really think that we are much happier here than people in New York and the houses here are much affordable than there.
I guess it all depends.
NicMM
[/quote]
No I do not think that, I should have added the qualifier, one of the least happy and most superficial. It has stiff competition from lots of other cities. LA, SF, NY would be obvious victors in this contest of crap.
BTW I am sure Barstow or detroit are are pretty unhappy places as well. My point was that most cities are happier healthier places for a fraction of the price. I apologize for overstating it.
December 20, 2010 at 3:08 PM #643293Participant[quote=NicMM]Jstoesz,
You really think “S. Californians are the least happy, and the most superficial of any place”? My friends visiting from New York really think that we are much happier here than people in New York and the houses here are much affordable than there.
I guess it all depends.
NicMM
[/quote]
No I do not think that, I should have added the qualifier, one of the least happy and most superficial. It has stiff competition from lots of other cities. LA, SF, NY would be obvious victors in this contest of crap.
BTW I am sure Barstow or detroit are are pretty unhappy places as well. My point was that most cities are happier healthier places for a fraction of the price. I apologize for overstating it.
December 20, 2010 at 3:08 PM #643429Participant[quote=NicMM]Jstoesz,
You really think “S. Californians are the least happy, and the most superficial of any place”? My friends visiting from New York really think that we are much happier here than people in New York and the houses here are much affordable than there.
I guess it all depends.
NicMM
[/quote]
No I do not think that, I should have added the qualifier, one of the least happy and most superficial. It has stiff competition from lots of other cities. LA, SF, NY would be obvious victors in this contest of crap.
BTW I am sure Barstow or detroit are are pretty unhappy places as well. My point was that most cities are happier healthier places for a fraction of the price. I apologize for overstating it.
December 20, 2010 at 3:08 PM #643750Participant[quote=NicMM]Jstoesz,
You really think “S. Californians are the least happy, and the most superficial of any place”? My friends visiting from New York really think that we are much happier here than people in New York and the houses here are much affordable than there.
I guess it all depends.
NicMM
[/quote]
No I do not think that, I should have added the qualifier, one of the least happy and most superficial. It has stiff competition from lots of other cities. LA, SF, NY would be obvious victors in this contest of crap.
BTW I am sure Barstow or detroit are are pretty unhappy places as well. My point was that most cities are happier healthier places for a fraction of the price. I apologize for overstating it.
December 20, 2010 at 3:14 PM #642656Eugene
Participant[quote=jstoesz]No I do not think that, I should have added the qualifier, one of the least happy and most superficial. It has stiff competition from lots of other cities. LA, SF, NY would be obvious victors in this contest of crap.
BTW I am sure Barstow or detroit are are pretty unhappy places as well. My point was that most cities are happier healthier places for a fraction of the price. I apologize for overstating it.[/quote]
Please name one large city that is happier, healthier, safer and cheaper than SD. And please don’t say Boise.
December 20, 2010 at 3:14 PM #642728Participant[quote=jstoesz]No I do not think that, I should have added the qualifier, one of the least happy and most superficial. It has stiff competition from lots of other cities. LA, SF, NY would be obvious victors in this contest of crap.
BTW I am sure Barstow or detroit are are pretty unhappy places as well. My point was that most cities are happier healthier places for a fraction of the price. I apologize for overstating it.[/quote]
Please name one large city that is happier, healthier, safer and cheaper than SD. And please don’t say Boise.
December 20, 2010 at 3:14 PM #643308Participant[quote=jstoesz]No I do not think that, I should have added the qualifier, one of the least happy and most superficial. It has stiff competition from lots of other cities. LA, SF, NY would be obvious victors in this contest of crap.
BTW I am sure Barstow or detroit are are pretty unhappy places as well. My point was that most cities are happier healthier places for a fraction of the price. I apologize for overstating it.[/quote]
Please name one large city that is happier, healthier, safer and cheaper than SD. And please don’t say Boise.
December 20, 2010 at 3:14 PM #643444Participant[quote=jstoesz]No I do not think that, I should have added the qualifier, one of the least happy and most superficial. It has stiff competition from lots of other cities. LA, SF, NY would be obvious victors in this contest of crap.
BTW I am sure Barstow or detroit are are pretty unhappy places as well. My point was that most cities are happier healthier places for a fraction of the price. I apologize for overstating it.[/quote]
Please name one large city that is happier, healthier, safer and cheaper than SD. And please don’t say Boise.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.