Home › Forums › Closed Forums › Properties or Areas › 4s ranch builder price advice
- This topic has 285 replies, 15 voices, and was last updated 16 years, 11 months ago by randy.
-
AuthorPosts
-
January 24, 2008 at 12:39 AM #142204January 24, 2008 at 12:39 AM #141883anParticipant
drunkle, point taken. I guess I was projecting the area I’m interested in to the rest of the other areas, which is wrong. We both agree then. I should have said, “ASSUMING 2003 is at fundamental…”. But since I’m talking about Jan 01, 2003 price instead of Dec 31, 2003 price, I’m not completely wrong, right? :-D.
January 24, 2008 at 12:39 AM #142107anParticipantdrunkle, point taken. I guess I was projecting the area I’m interested in to the rest of the other areas, which is wrong. We both agree then. I should have said, “ASSUMING 2003 is at fundamental…”. But since I’m talking about Jan 01, 2003 price instead of Dec 31, 2003 price, I’m not completely wrong, right? :-D.
January 24, 2008 at 12:39 AM #142122anParticipantdrunkle, point taken. I guess I was projecting the area I’m interested in to the rest of the other areas, which is wrong. We both agree then. I should have said, “ASSUMING 2003 is at fundamental…”. But since I’m talking about Jan 01, 2003 price instead of Dec 31, 2003 price, I’m not completely wrong, right? :-D.
January 24, 2008 at 12:39 AM #142147anParticipantdrunkle, point taken. I guess I was projecting the area I’m interested in to the rest of the other areas, which is wrong. We both agree then. I should have said, “ASSUMING 2003 is at fundamental…”. But since I’m talking about Jan 01, 2003 price instead of Dec 31, 2003 price, I’m not completely wrong, right? :-D.
January 24, 2008 at 12:39 AM #142209anParticipantdrunkle, point taken. I guess I was projecting the area I’m interested in to the rest of the other areas, which is wrong. We both agree then. I should have said, “ASSUMING 2003 is at fundamental…”. But since I’m talking about Jan 01, 2003 price instead of Dec 31, 2003 price, I’m not completely wrong, right? :-D.
January 24, 2008 at 12:45 AM #141893drunkleParticipantasian:
sure. and i’m looking for prices to hit where i can responsibly pay the mortgage, save for retirement and still have fun. which is why 2000 is my “fundamental”…
btw, my “fundamental” includes a 4 car garage, 2 acres with beach access and a pool. and a shack to crash in… so it’s cool.
January 24, 2008 at 12:45 AM #142117drunkleParticipantasian:
sure. and i’m looking for prices to hit where i can responsibly pay the mortgage, save for retirement and still have fun. which is why 2000 is my “fundamental”…
btw, my “fundamental” includes a 4 car garage, 2 acres with beach access and a pool. and a shack to crash in… so it’s cool.
January 24, 2008 at 12:45 AM #142131drunkleParticipantasian:
sure. and i’m looking for prices to hit where i can responsibly pay the mortgage, save for retirement and still have fun. which is why 2000 is my “fundamental”…
btw, my “fundamental” includes a 4 car garage, 2 acres with beach access and a pool. and a shack to crash in… so it’s cool.
January 24, 2008 at 12:45 AM #142157drunkleParticipantasian:
sure. and i’m looking for prices to hit where i can responsibly pay the mortgage, save for retirement and still have fun. which is why 2000 is my “fundamental”…
btw, my “fundamental” includes a 4 car garage, 2 acres with beach access and a pool. and a shack to crash in… so it’s cool.
January 24, 2008 at 12:45 AM #142219drunkleParticipantasian:
sure. and i’m looking for prices to hit where i can responsibly pay the mortgage, save for retirement and still have fun. which is why 2000 is my “fundamental”…
btw, my “fundamental” includes a 4 car garage, 2 acres with beach access and a pool. and a shack to crash in… so it’s cool.
January 24, 2008 at 12:45 AM #141888AnonymousGuestasian: But 2003 nominal price + 5 years of inflation, would not be too bad of a deal. When I’m talking about 2003 price, I mean Jan 1st, 2003, not Dec 31st, since 2003 saw a HUGE run up.
And if the price drops 6 months later with comparable interest rates, then yeah, it’s a bad deal if you care as much as I do about losing money.
January 24, 2008 at 12:45 AM #142112AnonymousGuestasian: But 2003 nominal price + 5 years of inflation, would not be too bad of a deal. When I’m talking about 2003 price, I mean Jan 1st, 2003, not Dec 31st, since 2003 saw a HUGE run up.
And if the price drops 6 months later with comparable interest rates, then yeah, it’s a bad deal if you care as much as I do about losing money.
January 24, 2008 at 12:45 AM #142127AnonymousGuestasian: But 2003 nominal price + 5 years of inflation, would not be too bad of a deal. When I’m talking about 2003 price, I mean Jan 1st, 2003, not Dec 31st, since 2003 saw a HUGE run up.
And if the price drops 6 months later with comparable interest rates, then yeah, it’s a bad deal if you care as much as I do about losing money.
January 24, 2008 at 12:45 AM #142152AnonymousGuestasian: But 2003 nominal price + 5 years of inflation, would not be too bad of a deal. When I’m talking about 2003 price, I mean Jan 1st, 2003, not Dec 31st, since 2003 saw a HUGE run up.
And if the price drops 6 months later with comparable interest rates, then yeah, it’s a bad deal if you care as much as I do about losing money.
-
AuthorPosts
- The forum ‘Properties or Areas’ is closed to new topics and replies.