- This topic has 315 replies, 25 voices, and was last updated 15 years, 1 month ago by
briansd1.
-
AuthorPosts
-
October 11, 2010 at 6:12 PM #617159October 12, 2010 at 1:19 AM #616177
mike92104
Participant[quote=Hatfield]I think 19 is the only thing I’m voting for. I can’t make heads or tails out of anything else on the ballot.[/quote]
Could not being to make heads or tails out of anything else be related to your support of prop 19? :)’
October 12, 2010 at 1:19 AM #616264Participant[quote=Hatfield]I think 19 is the only thing I’m voting for. I can’t make heads or tails out of anything else on the ballot.[/quote]
Could not being to make heads or tails out of anything else be related to your support of prop 19? :)’
October 12, 2010 at 1:19 AM #616816Participant[quote=Hatfield]I think 19 is the only thing I’m voting for. I can’t make heads or tails out of anything else on the ballot.[/quote]
Could not being to make heads or tails out of anything else be related to your support of prop 19? :)’
October 12, 2010 at 1:19 AM #616931Participant[quote=Hatfield]I think 19 is the only thing I’m voting for. I can’t make heads or tails out of anything else on the ballot.[/quote]
Could not being to make heads or tails out of anything else be related to your support of prop 19? :)’
October 12, 2010 at 1:19 AM #617244Participant[quote=Hatfield]I think 19 is the only thing I’m voting for. I can’t make heads or tails out of anything else on the ballot.[/quote]
Could not being to make heads or tails out of anything else be related to your support of prop 19? :)’
October 12, 2010 at 4:32 AM #616187Hatfield
ParticipantHahahaha, I guess I see how my wording might have left that impression, but actually I don’t partake.
What I meant to say was, it seems that reading through the current crop of ballot initiatives, the arguments for and against, and the stated affiliations of the people making those arguments, nothing really leaps out at me. It looks like the same old crap and I can’t get excited about any of it.
October 12, 2010 at 4:32 AM #616274ParticipantHahahaha, I guess I see how my wording might have left that impression, but actually I don’t partake.
What I meant to say was, it seems that reading through the current crop of ballot initiatives, the arguments for and against, and the stated affiliations of the people making those arguments, nothing really leaps out at me. It looks like the same old crap and I can’t get excited about any of it.
October 12, 2010 at 4:32 AM #616826ParticipantHahahaha, I guess I see how my wording might have left that impression, but actually I don’t partake.
What I meant to say was, it seems that reading through the current crop of ballot initiatives, the arguments for and against, and the stated affiliations of the people making those arguments, nothing really leaps out at me. It looks like the same old crap and I can’t get excited about any of it.
October 12, 2010 at 4:32 AM #616941ParticipantHahahaha, I guess I see how my wording might have left that impression, but actually I don’t partake.
What I meant to say was, it seems that reading through the current crop of ballot initiatives, the arguments for and against, and the stated affiliations of the people making those arguments, nothing really leaps out at me. It looks like the same old crap and I can’t get excited about any of it.
October 12, 2010 at 4:32 AM #617254ParticipantHahahaha, I guess I see how my wording might have left that impression, but actually I don’t partake.
What I meant to say was, it seems that reading through the current crop of ballot initiatives, the arguments for and against, and the stated affiliations of the people making those arguments, nothing really leaps out at me. It looks like the same old crap and I can’t get excited about any of it.
October 15, 2010 at 9:45 PM #618434CAwireman
ParticipantOkay, back to the overall intent of the post – who/what are you voting for?
Lot’s of offices and other props/ballots.
My wife and I listened to some of the debates. Still mulling it over.
My thinking at the moment:
19 – [Update – US Govt to
prosecute usage regardless of how prop 19 goes. So, no real reason to vote it in unless trying to make a statement….]
20 – No, save money.
21 – No
22 – Yes
23 – No
24 – No
25 – No
26 – No
27 – YesOctober 15, 2010 at 9:45 PM #618520ParticipantOkay, back to the overall intent of the post – who/what are you voting for?
Lot’s of offices and other props/ballots.
My wife and I listened to some of the debates. Still mulling it over.
My thinking at the moment:
19 – [Update – US Govt to
prosecute usage regardless of how prop 19 goes. So, no real reason to vote it in unless trying to make a statement….]
20 – No, save money.
21 – No
22 – Yes
23 – No
24 – No
25 – No
26 – No
27 – YesOctober 15, 2010 at 9:45 PM #619069ParticipantOkay, back to the overall intent of the post – who/what are you voting for?
Lot’s of offices and other props/ballots.
My wife and I listened to some of the debates. Still mulling it over.
My thinking at the moment:
19 – [Update – US Govt to
prosecute usage regardless of how prop 19 goes. So, no real reason to vote it in unless trying to make a statement….]
20 – No, save money.
21 – No
22 – Yes
23 – No
24 – No
25 – No
26 – No
27 – YesOctober 15, 2010 at 9:45 PM #619188ParticipantOkay, back to the overall intent of the post – who/what are you voting for?
Lot’s of offices and other props/ballots.
My wife and I listened to some of the debates. Still mulling it over.
My thinking at the moment:
19 – [Update – US Govt to
prosecute usage regardless of how prop 19 goes. So, no real reason to vote it in unless trying to make a statement….]
20 – No, save money.
21 – No
22 – Yes
23 – No
24 – No
25 – No
26 – No
27 – Yes -
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
