11629 Thistle Hill Pl, Carmel Valley / 92130

[SD Realtor]

Went there today. Oh man… Very poor floorplan. Yeah the flooring is … well… not quite my taste. The home backs up to power lines and sits far back on the lot. It is squeezed into a tight lot. Very tiny backyard. The living room has two windows that have a great view of the side yard. The master bedroom is downstairs right off the family room. Upstairs there are 2 bedrooms and den. Not a great layout. I have seen many better floorplans for 200k less in LCV.

[sdrealtor]

That house screams of former model home.

[sdrealtor]

That house screams of former model home.

[sdrealtor]

That house screams of former model home.

[sdrealtor]

That house screams of former model home.

[sdrealtor]

That house screams of former model home.

[pepsi]

Yes, the floor is ugly in the picture, but when I stand on it, I think it seems ok (not great, just ok).

The floor plan is terrible. I still can not figure out a good way for my family (2 little kids) to live in this house. If we all live downstair, we have to go upstair for office/game or exercise.
And kids are too small to live in their own rooms alone. My wife would not live upstair alone, not to mention the young kids.

The 2nd floor lacks of views (or large windows) and makes me feel cramped.

All’s been said, the price is irrisistible.
$244/sqf….I think it is lower than my projected bottom ($250) for CV.

[pepsi]

Yes, the floor is ugly in the picture, but when I stand on it, I think it seems ok (not great, just ok).

The floor plan is terrible. I still can not figure out a good way for my family (2 little kids) to live in this house. If we all live downstair, we have to go upstair for office/game or exercise.
And kids are too small to live in their own rooms alone. My wife would not live upstair alone, not to mention the young kids.

The 2nd floor lacks of views (or large windows) and makes me feel cramped.

All’s been said, the price is irrisistible.
$244/sqf….I think it is lower than my projected bottom ($250) for CV.

[pepsi]

Yes, the floor is ugly in the picture, but when I stand on it, I think it seems ok (not great, just ok).

The floor plan is terrible. I still can not figure out a good way for my family (2 little kids) to live in this house. If we all live downstair, we have to go upstair for office/game or exercise.
And kids are too small to live in their own rooms alone. My wife would not live upstair alone, not to mention the young kids.

The 2nd floor lacks of views (or large windows) and makes me feel cramped.

All’s been said, the price is irrisistible.
$244/sqf….I think it is lower than my projected bottom ($250) for CV.

[pepsi]

Yes, the floor is ugly in the picture, but when I stand on it, I think it seems ok (not great, just ok).

The floor plan is terrible. I still can not figure out a good way for my family (2 little kids) to live in this house. If we all live downstair, we have to go upstair for office/game or exercise.
And kids are too small to live in their own rooms alone. My wife would not live upstair alone, not to mention the young kids.

The 2nd floor lacks of views (or large windows) and makes me feel cramped.

All’s been said, the price is irrisistible.
$244/sqf….I think it is lower than my projected bottom ($250) for CV.

[pepsi]

Yes, the floor is ugly in the picture, but when I stand on it, I think it seems ok (not great, just ok).

The floor plan is terrible. I still can not figure out a good way for my family (2 little kids) to live in this house. If we all live downstair, we have to go upstair for office/game or exercise.
And kids are too small to live in their own rooms alone. My wife would not live upstair alone, not to mention the young kids.

The 2nd floor lacks of views (or large windows) and makes me feel cramped.

All’s been said, the price is irrisistible.
$244/sqf….I think it is lower than my projected bottom ($250) for CV.

[ocrenter]

[img_assist|nid=11221|title=no small children allowed|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=376|height=253]

“a collaboration between the Childhood Cancer Research Group at the University of Oxford and National Grid owners, Transco – looked at cancer data in England and Wales between 1962 and 1995, for children aged up to 15 years old.

They were able to map how far each child lived from a high voltage overhead power line. Comparing the children who had cancer with a control group of 29,000 children without cancer but who lived in comparable districts, found that children whose birth address was within 200 metres of an overhead power line had a 70% increased risk of leukemia. Children living 200 to 600 m away from power lines had a 20% increased risk.”

[ocrenter]

[img_assist|nid=11221|title=no small children allowed|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=376|height=253]

“a collaboration between the Childhood Cancer Research Group at the University of Oxford and National Grid owners, Transco – looked at cancer data in England and Wales between 1962 and 1995, for children aged up to 15 years old.

They were able to map how far each child lived from a high voltage overhead power line. Comparing the children who had cancer with a control group of 29,000 children without cancer but who lived in comparable districts, found that children whose birth address was within 200 metres of an overhead power line had a 70% increased risk of leukemia. Children living 200 to 600 m away from power lines had a 20% increased risk.”

[ocrenter]

[img_assist|nid=11221|title=no small children allowed|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=376|height=253]

“a collaboration between the Childhood Cancer Research Group at the University of Oxford and National Grid owners, Transco – looked at cancer data in England and Wales between 1962 and 1995, for children aged up to 15 years old.

They were able to map how far each child lived from a high voltage overhead power line. Comparing the children who had cancer with a control group of 29,000 children without cancer but who lived in comparable districts, found that children whose birth address was within 200 metres of an overhead power line had a 70% increased risk of leukemia. Children living 200 to 600 m away from power lines had a 20% increased risk.”

[ocrenter]

[img_assist|nid=11221|title=no small children allowed|desc=|link=node|align=left|width=376|height=253]

“a collaboration between the Childhood Cancer Research Group at the University of Oxford and National Grid owners, Transco – looked at cancer data in England and Wales between 1962 and 1995, for children aged up to 15 years old.

They were able to map how far each child lived from a high voltage overhead power line. Comparing the children who had cancer with a control group of 29,000 children without cancer but who lived in comparable districts, found that children whose birth address was within 200 metres of an overhead power line had a 70% increased risk of leukemia. Children living 200 to 600 m away from power lines had a 20% increased risk.”

[Author]

Posts