Your Data for 0.0 heterosexual transmission? Because here’s mine:
Estimated adult and adolescent AIDS diagnoses in 2009 and cumulative diagnoses since the beginning of the epidemic through 2009, by transmission route and gender
Transmission route 2009 diagnoses Cumulative diagnoses
Male Female Male Female
Male-to-male sexual contact 17,171 – 535,570 –
Injection drug use 3,207 1,982 173,351 90,102
Male-to-male sexual contact and injection drug use 1,608 – 73,006 –
Heterosexual contact 3,956 6,740 59,593 131,886
Other 159 157 96,977 7,185
Total* 26,102 8,879 882,074
229,173
* Because totals are calculated independently of the sub-populations, the values in each column may not sum exactly to the figure in the ‘Total’ row
These are 2009 numbers. I realize this didn’t cut-paste well, but if you look at the four numbers after the heterosexual contact, those are the new 2009 cases, male/female, then the cumulative numbers male/female. Heterosexual contact does exist, one of the reasons the male heterosexual numbers are so much lower is believed to be due to high proportion of circumcised males.
Just because you don’t want to believe in heterosexual transmission doesn’t mean it’s not happening.
