His research led to one conclusion: the offical story is a lie.
Anyone who seriously wants to say the offical story is true, should first take the time to watch this video. Without hearing both sides, how can you possibly know the truth? Just saying “it could never be a planned demolition because I don’t want to believe it to be so” is just burying our heads in the sand. It’s like saying the housing bubble doesn’t exist.
Seriously, those of you who say the government version is correct, reminds me of the anger?? thread, where people get mad when you say their house will go down in value. They don’t want to consider the other side. PD’s most recent posts are interesting science fiction, but don’t contain any serious substance to address the problems with heat, pancaking, seismographs, center support columns, explosions, lack of fuel, impacts, physics, and eyewitness accounts.
I was open minded enough to consider this. Why don’t you?