Once again, dan, you fail to understand that I am only telling what the jihadists say and what they are basing it on. To say that I hold those same sentiments and to again call me a bigot is very dishonest of you.
[/quote]
Well am I being dishonest or have I failed to understand?
You need to keep up with yourself here.
The sentiment that I say you hold is the one that you have said you hold.
[quote=surveyor]I think you should start reading the koran. The current problems we have with islamofacism is due to the calls to islamic supremacy that is within the koran, and hadiths. This islamic supremacy actually does fit the definition of ideology. All muslims are required, per the koran, to wage war against the unbelievers. Luckily, not all muslims are interested in waging war, but they are required to do so.
(and PLEASE don’t try to use the argument that the bible/christianity is just as violent as the koran/islam. You would be devastatingly wrong.)
[/quote]
Remember that one?
By describing a world religion as inherently warlike and all pious followers as violent, you have made a bigoted statement.
I don’t think calling a spade a spade (or a bigot a bigot makes me look bad).
[quote=surveyor]
But you can call me a bigot all you want it doesn’t change what the jihadists have been saying or doing.
It’s similar to calling a cop or a reporter a serial killer when the cop or reporter is just describing the motivations and the origins of the serial killer.
But you know, you can’t dispute the facts, so you attack the person. Ad hominem. But like I say, it does not change the facts of the story nor does it change the validity of my arguments.[/quote]
I don’t really get what your “facts” are.
You have stated that the dude from Mt. Hood is a terrorist based upon a broad collection of anecdotes and pasted together along with a lot of debate-club rehash to intimidate dissent.
