And the claims of some AGW proponents are no less insidious? When I make unsupported statements, I always ‘couch’ my statements when I can’t support them. I also point out what needs to be checked. I feel that you are simply being argumentative here.
you’re right, i’m arguing that you’re jumping to conclusions. what about it?
as for “insidious agw claims”, what, predictions of global catastrophe based on evidence and models? as opposed to your “innocuous” slander based on unsubstantive speculation?
