…Maybe the other awful post had a grain of truth to it?
Rustico, I believe you are aware that I tell it like it is, and I don’t coward to any men on this site, or elsewhere for that matter. To that end, I would guess by “awful post” you are talking about Dave’s post. From the previous posts I’ve read by Dave, I’m not sure he even has a soul. Furthermore, anyone that agrees with Tom Leykis or advocates his sleazy advice or outlook on the female sex is just as sleazy as he is. Sorry, Dave. In my experience, any man who has that outlook is not capable of treating his wife right because inwardly, and probably outwardly, he lacks respect for her.
pj is right. Spousal support is awarded for a reason. If the United States court systems deems such support valid, who are we to argue that.
Any woman that uses sex as a way to profit from a marriage, can aguably be defined as a prostitute. To say that most women go into marriage with that intent is an overly cynical view of life. It also shows an innate distrust of the opposite sex, and perhaps a dislike of oneself. On the other hand, to say a woman shouldn’t be compenstated for doing housework and putting her career aside to raise children is a very greedy and self-serving perspective.
