[quote=SK in CV][quote=AN][quote=SK in CV][quote=AN]Me all over the place? You’re the one who’s all over the place. So, $250k is wealthy or not? Answer that simple question before we proceed.[/quote]
I’m pretty sure I’ve given you my answer on that a few times.
I think of wealthy as assets acquired rather than income. But $250K of annual income is sufficient to live a wealthy lifestyle. That would be a lifestyle better than 97% of the population.[/quote]
Is it really that hard to answer yes or no?[/quote]
No, it’s pretty easy. Is it really that hard to understand my answer?[/quote]
If it’s pretty easy, then why not just answer yes or no? No, it’s pretty easy to understand what you’re trying to say, but I see you’re leaving yourself some room for future maneuvering and I was trying to pin down exactly what your view is on $250k income and whether it’s wealthy or not. You say wealth is assets, yet you also say $250k income is sufficient to live a wealthy lifestyle. How can one not be wealthy yet live a wealthy lifestyle? So, if I read it right, $250k income alone is not wealthy. Yet you support the tax on the wealthy with $250k as the cut off for minimum? Not to mention this tax is on income and not assets. So, if you make $250k but have negative assets (big student loans), are you wealthy or working poor? According to tax the rich and $250k limit, this group of people would be consider rich/wealthy.
