[quote=sdnativeson]ZK, your point is moot. It comes down to original or, attempting original thought. So, in your world everything is “true”, “valid”, “proven” upon conception and/or initiation?
Looks like Utopia has an internet connection.
[/quote]
What makes you say that in my world “everything is “true”, “valid”, “proven” upon conception and/or initiation?” I haven’t written anything that would indicate that I think that. I’d be interested to hear how you came up with that.
I’m not saying, “just because people think it’s wrong, it’s wrong.” (BTW, the reason I think it’s wrong because the science behind it isn’t really science; it’s just wishful thinking.) What I’m saying is that equating the concept of irreducible complexity with Einstein’s ideas just because both of them were thought to be wrong doesn’t add any credence to the idea of irreducible complexity. Why would it?
