I was hoping you were just joking during your first comments, but I see you’re defending Cramer all the way. I don’t watch Cramer’s show much, but I’ve seen it a few times. Come on…..Cramer is a tool, and he got called/caught in a funny skeet because his big mouth coudn’t take a comediant’s criticism. He could bearly keep a straight face when Stewart provided great evidence during the 2006 shady advise on hedge funds (manipulate the sheeple). He’s just a puppet for the many CEOs he has been interviewing..
Whom do you preffer? Steward being funny (maybe annoying to some) or Kramer the finacial advisor/trader and screwing people with his idiotic advice?[/quote]
Cramer was wrong. I’m not defending him about that. He runs an entertainment TV show. Stewart? He does the same. They both run snake oil operations right? But Cramer is the one pretending to be serious and Stewart is the one who admits he’s not serious? That’s what I have a problem with.
NOW Cramer is the one who is admitting he’s an entertainer and NOW Stewart is the one trying to make a serious critique and do “investigative journalism” some peoples words. ITS NOT. That’s what I have a problem with. Don’t eat up everything Stewart is saying just because he’s a funny guy.
He’s not making a serious critique. Nothing he has said gets to the root of ANY problem. He has VERY little understanding of the economy and how we got here. The easiest thing for him to do is blame CNBC because they are visible. It’s a BLAME GAME. We love to see a lynching.
The rest of us cheer him on because we want someone to blame. I don’t care for Cramer. I don’t like his predictions and how many times he called a housing bottom… but Stewart is doing the ABSOLUTE same thing. The difference?
Stewart is a hero in your eyes and Cramer is a villian.
They’re BOTH snake oil salesman and NO Stewart doesn’t come clean with that, not on last nights episode anyway. He pretends that or thinks that he’s making a serious critique when he has 0 substance.
