rocket science
“Next we will not want to take responsibility for pouring hot coffee in our laps and blame the seller of said coffee for making it hot.”
Little off topic but I felt you might wnat to educate yourself before throwing out this statement. I assume you are referrign to Stellaa Stubeck from the McDonalds case.
McDonalds had over 1000 compliants about the coffee being excessively hot . There were other burn victims who ahd taken Mcdonalds to court and McDonalds had won the cases. Stella’s attorney had beaten McDonalds on one of the cases and offered to settle for around 20K . McDonalds refused to settle.
McDonalds had also recieved numerous requests from the Shriners in regards to the dangerous temperature of their coffee. They dismissed the complaints.
When McDonalds was ultimately found negligent the victim earned money for paind and suffereing and McDonalds had to pay punitive damages. The punitive damage equated to less than 1 day of coffee sales.
Additioanlly the dmaages were capped so the award was bogus.
Stella stuback suffered disfoming and permanent damage to her vaginal area becaese McDonalds negligence, After all the legal fees and negotiation she earned less than a couple hundred thousands.
Just thought you might want tto know the truth of the McDonalds myth.
