Re: Radelow’s project – which I still think is cool – and my question about the inclusion of low density housing….
In counterpoint there are are other factors, too. Increasing density also means increasing infrastructure and dealing with traffic impacts. There might be topography problems or height limitations or who knows what else.
I was just saying that, all other things being equal, our community needs more medium and high density housing in areas that have services and transportation like Mission Valley. There is no pressing need for more high dollar SFDs in this area.
