Your comments are duly noted and I agree with what you’re saying. Again, I’d like to point out that my intent here was to discourage the voyeur factor, which was already acknowledged by one participant in this thread. I’m in no way advocating we not watch out for our neighbors’ interests even when we’re in a position to do so.
It’s just like when we were throwing names and complete addresses up in a couple of the previous threads and people were making comments about the individuals. I doubt that anyone had a malicious intent in that, they probably just hadn’t thought it all the way through. The discussion that followed that was intended to get people to consider that line of discussion in a different light. It may not seem this way, but I was just offering additional input, not trying to exercise the jackboot of censorship.
