[quote=paramount][quote=Blogstar]
But yeah, homosexuals can have kids, she could have found a gay man to do the deed. They can make babies for each other and/or adopt. Sperm bank sounds less complicated.[/quote]
Then in that case is the original couple really having the child, or is the gay man and the lesbian woman actually having the child? They gay man IS the father.
Yes, they can adopt, but that is not the same as “having” a baby. Not better or worse, just a different process.
Are we now going to defy biology? we don’t get to make those rules. It is what it is…I can’t change that and neither can you.
But in general I do believe an adopted child is best placed in a home with a mother (female) and father (male).[/quote]
in general, i do believe an adopted child is best placed in a home with a minimum family income of $250,000.
in general, i do believe an adopted child is best placed in a home with parents without substance absue problems and whoa re able to frm clear emotional boundaries.
in general, i do believe an adopted child is best placed in a home with parents with lots of outside social support, involved gradnparents, freinds, social contacts,e tc.
in general, i do believe an adopted child is best placed in a home with people who geneuinely enjoy having children around and arent just adopting from some sense that they “should” have a family…
i don’t know, there are lots of things that could make a home better or worse, and maybe there’s an arguemnt that a man and a woman at the helm is in general “better”, but probably only better int he sense that it is slightly more societally normal and might perhaps submit the kid to maybe less teasing.
maybe. you guys seen the video of the 18 year old engineering student from iowa raised by two moms testifying before iowa lawmakers on his family? it was pretty compelling. i’ll try to dig it up. kinda makes one woder about the “in generals” what may be better are perhaps subsumed by the compellingness of the individuals…
