[quote=ocrenter]
We need something a whole lot more pragmatic than deporting American grown kids because they were “cutting”. That’s just plain stupid.
.[/quote]
That’s the problem. We do it, and it sets the expectation of just come and hide long enough for your kids to be ‘american’ grown.
How long is that? How young is it?
Do they need to come under the age of 1? 2? 3? 5? 10?
How long do they need to be here? Already 18? Successful in school, no run ins with the law?
Or will it be they’re over 14?
Or 10?
Or 5?
And how many other issues be we bring by encouraging millions to live in the shadows so their children will be ‘american’ grown?
That’s why need a draconian policy and then grant ayslum for the ‘countryless’ american grown children.
We need the policy first, then the asylum. Asylum first, brings a repeat.
For every kid like Ana in the prior article what other negatives are we getting in the basket of illegal immigration?
For every Ana, is encouraging their families to stay and keep Ana here bringing others with one kid that will drop out and become a gangbanger? 1/10th? 1/100th?
It will take 100 Anas to counter the costs we incur for one additional gangbanger.
It isnt even gang members. Ana represents what success rate? I look at LAUSD and they have a 1/3 drop out rate. If Ana is 1 in 100 achieving like that, even 1 in 10 achieving like that, we 3 drop outs. At 1 in 100 it’s 30 drop outs.
What’s the cost to our society of facilitating 30 more drop outs?
And no, I’m not blaming their community for the gang problem or the school failure problem, however it’s not making it better and the additional costs are real.
