[quote=ocrenter][quote=dumbrenter][quote=ocrenter][quote=dumbrenter]We should have mandatory registration of all knives over 4 inches long, clubs, baseball bats and dog owners.
Any dog owner letting their dog off the leash in a public area should prosecuted by a government appointed panel.[/quote]
GLad you brought up dogs. All dogs are mandated to be registered. If caught having an unlicensed dog, a fine is assessed. An unlicensed dog involved in an altercation you are now looking at charges of an at large dog and having a vicious dog. Dogs that exchange hands need to be re-licensed, and so on.
Great example dumbrenter, thanks![/quote]
Thank you. Also note that there is no demand for national registry of dog owners and most of the registrations on local government level (not even state if I am not mistaken). There will be no media generated frenzy if you are attacked by a dog.[/quote]
So are you saying if local government is going to start registering all guns within its border, you would be ok with it then?
Reason why national registry works better is because trafficking of guns would be easier than trafficking of dogs.[/quote]
Almost. The local governments can ‘try’ to start registering all guns. You are missing the key difference between how dogs are registered and what you are asking for.
Your reason for national registry working better for guns is both immature and ignores how laws are made. To address one, it is harder to transport other humans against their wishes than trafficking dogs. Does it mean we should now have a national registry of all humans? Does an American have a choice of refusing to be registered? Don’t even bother coming back to me with SS# or drivers license…they are not obligatory and will show you are either confused between rights & privileges or that you have a control freak agenda.
Interesting how it starts with guns but is all about control.
