Now spending for a transgendered bathroom. Hmm. 🙂
Back on topic.
Quote:
The court effectively ruled that states must convey all benefits to same sex couples as are available to opposite sex couples.
My statement said this is exactly what a civil union does. Followed by ‘strict’ econ perspective.
Emotion aside, just make two columns and compare costs. Just like Econ 200. That is as far as I wanted to discuss because as like the rest here, I don’t care what you do with whomever, wherever, or whatever.
So why haven’t the feminists weighed in the polygamist lifestyle?
