no_such_reality wrote:svelte

[svelte]

[quote=no_such_reality][quote=svelte]Let’s see.

Iowa didn’t pick the eventual Republican nominee in 2012:

http://elections.nytimes.com/2012/primaries/states/iowa

Or in 2008:

http://politics.nytimes.com/election-guide/2008/results/states/IA.html

And did in 2004 only because Bush ran unopposed in the Republican party.

Not so sure Iowa’s results tell us much.[/quote]

Actually Iowa told Us tons. It effectively identified three candidates on the repub side with the rest not garnering 25% collectively and the highest 9%. It also showed Rubio strong in the population centers.
[/quote]

Top three candidates were Cruz, Trump, Rubio. Rest in the noise. Exactly what the polls told us before Iowa.

As I said, didn’t tell us much.