That would be the editorial board. I’m talking about their news department. Count the number of articles about Clinton’s email. Then count the number that mention that the director of the FBI said there were no properly marked classified emails sent or received by her. Zero. Count the number of articles about the Clinton foundation which include zero evidence of any corruption. Now count the number about the Trump foundation which has a dozen or so charges of corruption with evidence. Read Maureen Dowd’s column’s. She can’t type more than a few hundred words without criticizing Clinton.[/quote]
😉 Gotcha. Simply critiquing the Dems doesn’t mean it isn’t Dem leaning – and last I checked the editors were the people in charge.[/quote]
Right, I didn’t say Dems. As far as political party, they reflect their city. It leans more Dem than Republican. But I said Clinton specifically. The political reporters do not like the Clintons, and haven’t since Bill was President. It shows in what they cover and how they cover it.
