[quote=njtosd][quote=scaredyclassic]no. america is the almost decent looking chick who happened to fuck the alpha dude thinking maybe he would date her. she listened to his bullshit all night, all about himself. she thought he liked her but really, he was just looking for something to bone. he will ass rape her in the morning kind of consensually, but not really, he’ll just kind of grab it and go for it, and she will just sort of pretend it feels ok. he will come and then move on to fucking other bitches.
but it seemed like he really liked you.
now you have herpes, but on the bright side, its just in your ass.[/quote]
Spoken like a beta dude – sorry scaredy but this is beneath you. I get that you’re trying to expand on Harvey’s charming analogy – but it’s offensive. I know that most women have stopped posting on this site (none of you ever seem to wonder why) but there are a few of us left.
Also, it sounds sadly like the self soothing inner musings of the little guy at the bar who has a hard time with women and, until she left with the alpha male, thought the “almost decent looking chick” was the most gorgeous creature he ever saw. And the little guy doesn’t really know what she sees in the A male nor can he know what will happen between the two of them, but the B male sure would like it if she was subjected to horrible things so that she bitterly regrets not leaving with him.[/quote]
i am a beta dude.
apologies, sincerely.
some guys are winners, some guys are losers. america wanted a winner. a domineering alpha male.
According to a source at New York Magazine, Trump told a friend that you have to “treat [women] like shit,” seemingly to get what you want out of them.
i strongly believe donald said that, based on the pussy comment. hell, i think — no, i KNOW — lots of guys say and act on that. the intended purpose of doing that is to show you dont need potential female mates, they need you. all people tend to desire things they cannot have, so it is generally a bad mating strategy for either males or females to appear too easily attainable.
its also an effective defense mechanism against rejection, that allows more fragile men to push ahead in the mating game.
that was the source of where my off color analogy came from.
i think modern america believes that you do need to treat others like shit to establish dominance..
there certainly is some truth that we are all sexually attracted to strength, or the poortunity to impose strength on eeakness, and repulsed by sheer weakness, and any sign of weakness or neediness (esp. in initial meetings] is beta and repulsive.
treating people harshly can be a sign of strength, as was displayed beautifully in the debates:
you nasty woman
WRONG
WRONG!!!
when they go low, they win, esp.if you go high [beta and weak]. polite. attacked, and not responding with overwhelming force. america read that as weak.
neediness is the core of my own personal betahood. and an extreme level of deference, respect and politeness that is generally centered around my neediness and status anxiety.
no insult intended. and youre right. the woman left with the other guy at the bar for a whole host of reasons. he was better looking, stronger, displayed more attractive sexual characteristics, was more relaxed, less needy, funnier, projected more available resources. made her feel good, safe and excited.
he may not treat her worse, that is true. but it is also true that he has way more options, say, than me, the neurotic, weaker, unsure, servile dude, as he should, by his very nature. where the beta dude will not.
it is not unjust. the woman is not stupid. neither is anyone stupid. it is all just nature.the strongest and healthiest survive.
there are apparently though new rules and boundaries of how that essential truth may be permissibly expressed in presidential debates.
still, we should have standards and limits on piggington. and i believe i violated them.
again apologies. [see, even my apology has a groveling beta tone. ;)]
i truly feel bad that i made a woman uncomfortable. beta.
