[quote=markmax33]
So you are saying that a possibly biased ruling by 9 judges 30 years ago is more valuable than a biased ruling today? I don’t get that? I have never once heard you refute the point that all aspects of things similar to abortion were left to the States and why that isn’t proof it should be left to the States or an amendment should be passed. I personally don’t care about abortions and I think they should be legal. I have a much bigger issue with the precedent of the GOV overstepping its bounds at any time.
You really don’t get the fact that the Constitution was put in place to limit the GOV so we didn’t end up slaves to the GOV. That attitude of your generation is going to destroy it for our generation and our children’s generation.[/quote]
Straw man. I’m not saying it’s more valuable. I’m saying pretty clearly, I don’t want it overturned. I don’t think it was as sound a decision as it could have been. Nor was PP v. Casey. But both are the current law.
The constitution was not put into place to solely limit the power of government. If that had been what the authors wanted, it would not have enumerated the many powers vested in the government.
I’m not sure which attitude of my generation you’re referring to. You object to sex, drugs and rock and roll?
