Lol rewritibg would waste our times and yours. As previous told to you the solution is changing the perception of govrrnment. Any legislation would be desd on arrival in the cali assembly. It is the group that voted to block cities from declaring Bk unless they did arbitration. They are the same group who in response recent election are looking to ways to squash the peoplesnwill.
The solution is to first wake the peoplenul so they quit electing people like those in bell and cudahy. (Ibgive up trying to edit typos on the kindle)
[Quote=bearishgurl][quote=sdrealtor]Just to be clear the only one mentioning public sector employees and pensions on this thread was CAR. The boots on the ground were not vilified here so stop being so defensive. It’s a horribly corrupt and inefficient public sector. All the issues are systemic. I have never seen enraged citizens protesting outside fire stations or hurling tomatoes at firemen. I don’t see individuals getting vilified. It’s the system that gets vilified and the boots on the ground whining why are you picking on me when we question the system.[/quote]
Isn’t it this very “system” that you alone are vilifying here which (presumably) draws buyers like moths to a flame to Gridlocked Nirvana (east of I-5) and surrounds simply because they want *newer* construction with restrictive CC&R’s?? Don’t you make your living selling properties in this area … some to well-qualified “public sector” employees?
These same buyers could very likely get a better-built (poss custom) “luxury” LARGER HOME with better appts (ex. floor to ceiling rock FP) with WIDE RV access on a MUCH LARGER lot for the same or LESS money in 91902, 92019, 92028, 92084, 92001, etc. Instead they are flocking to CC&R/MR encumbered properties in and adjacent to your stomping grounds, many with small lots. Isn’t it these very CC&R’s that your clients are paying for because they supposedly “desire” them??
Your memory seems to be failing you. You’re biting the hand that feeds you.
Twice here, I’ve offered you, NSR and “harvey” your chance to work on changing “the system” many weeks ago by rewriting legislation for your representatives and even offered to proofread your work. So far, no one has taken me up on that offer.
It seems that now you must accept the things for which you cannot change. The Covenant is entitled to set their own design standards, change them on a majority vote of the Board and enforce their *latest* standards (even unrecorded) upon the property owners within it as long as they adhere to the notice requirements of the *new* guidelines and the enforcement of such passes the “reasonableness” test.
The justices have spoken.
When you pick up your kid from critter camp today, why don’t you take some more pics of the new RSF fire stn so the Piggs can enjoy viewing it from different angles? :=][/quote]
