I’ve seen that before and I thought it was going to be awesome, but it appears to be missing sales? (i.e. some of the ones we’ve found on both Redfin and Zillow). Still useful though, so thanks.
Anyway, I have to say I am totally confused at this point with whatever numbers you’re saying are right for you. In no instance, do I have you doing better than 2000 or 2001, even if I use your preferred comp. Here’s the “best” I could find for your comps (best meaning highest, not most representative, typical, realistic, etc…)
So 2000 would be 56% higher in price and 15% higher in payment; 2001 would be 24% higher in price (as you said originally) and 4% in payment.
Maybe I’m using wrong assumptions for payment or something.
With the 2000 example, it looks like you’re pretty close to what ocrenter was talking about, though.
…and I’m still working on the numbers my house. The link you provided is helpful, but it’s all very slow going. So far, I don’t think I’m as close as you are.
