I was not playing with numbers. I was showing you data to make my point. All assumptions I made were in favor of your argument and still the data shows there is not a lot of people in your age range that would be in the position to buy.
Using the numbers you state for marriage: 4 out of 10 women and 1 out of 10 men in that age range are married. So my 50% married assumption can be reduced to less than 30%. this brings the contribution of potential demand from this age group to 2%.
As stated on the bottom of page (and the reason I like this site) … In God we trust, everyone else bring data.
I am rebutting your argument that there are a not a lot of people in this age range contributing to demand and using data to support my rebuttal. I am not saying there isn’t anybody, it sounds like you know quite a few, but show me some data that suggest there is a significant amount. I don’t consider 2% a significant amount.
