i think im willing to go with ca renters argument here. assuming ti’s a good thing for the govt to promote homeownership just for the sake of the argument, it’s only a specific type of homeownership that is worthy of promotion or incentivization. That is, homeownership by people lviing in the home. it’s kind of dumb for the govt to promote the ownership of homes just as an asset in the same class as gold or old comics books, or whatever. in fact, it’s seems kind of commonsense and not even arguable. the govt shoudln’t give the same benefit to someone or some trust or entity buying 100 homes as it should to some guy buying a place to live for himself and his little squawking people.
