I do not dispute any of your assertions phaster, just trying to correct brian’s comment where he said the conservative court will likely take the case. He was missing the point as to why there were recent posts because the news of the day was they already reviewed and declined to take up the case. As a follower of scotus but not the city’s pension I was trying to point out and give an analogy that brian’s comment was akin to saying that team X will lose the game because of y, when in fact the game ended an hour ago and they won. And as a younger man I would have challenged him with a wager, seeing that he was predicting the outcome of something that already happened and the result was the opposite of what he predicted.
