[quote=FlyerInHi][quote=NotCranky]
Voting for your husband, who is probably a major financial contributor to the household, makes sense if you are hoping the candidate is going to improve his local job prospects and keep him from committing suicide, right or wrong on that hope.
Also it’s more likely if women voted for male gender reasons, they voted for their sons as much as the fathers. Children matter if you have them. I know my brother did a complete 360 when his daughter came out of the closet. One issue voter now, which I think is pretty nuts but i don’t bother him about it.[/quote]
Very traditional family values here. Sounds like the women have resigned themselves to be their husband’s wives.
How about voting for your own aspirations so that your daughters have move choices and don’t have to follow in your footsteps?[/quote]
The breadwinner situation is a fact for a lot of people, even in two income homes a woman wants for her and her husband to be able to find work.
Progressive women are doing more harm to their daughters and especially their sons by driving off and /or demonizing or feminizing the father figure in america than anything that comes from reasonably loving traditional families. The pendulum swung too far and we need it to swing back somewhat. Checks and balances.
Either way , progressives lost , you haven’t shown the way , you have shown that you want to live in a bubble and protect the bubble.