[quote=FlyerInHi][quote=scaredyclassic]not a correlation. justa hypothetical.
if one states “all tidy people are superior”, then there need exist only one tidy pedophile to counter the initial proposition. there’s no correlation; just a hypothetical example to ounter a kind of absurd initial sweeping proposition.[/quote]
When I state that “tidy people are superior”, I mean in general, limited to the area of personal space. Of course, I don’t mean “all 100% of tidy” people. I think that we have to be mindful of the context.
People think that neat freaks are fussy, demanding and difficult to be around. I understand that, and I don’t really mind. That’s why I try hard not be fussy and demanding of others when I obtain services. But when it comes to my own personal space, I’m very quick to judge.
I think it’s like drugs, alcohol, food and other personal weaknesses. The people doing it to themselves are no hurting or bothering anyone. I would vigorously defend their right to do as they please. But we can still judge and not want any of that in our own lives.
Example here. When I go with friends to a restaurant and they order dishes that I don’t think are worth eating, I will just stay quiet and let them enjoy. But in my mind, I would think huh, no. When people leave a messy table full of bunched up napkins, I think “glad I don’t live with such people.”[/quote]
well, thats sure not what you said above. here you seem to be saying, all things being equal being tidy is better. above, you seem to be saying tidy people ar eless likely to use drugs, have bad lives, have better upbringings.
and there’s no particular evidence for that.
autistic people might be very neat and orderly…and damaged. being neat and tidy probably doesn’t mean shit.
it’s very difficult to hear you when the tone is so utterly judgmental.
it might be as simple as saying: I prefer tidiness to messiness.
all the inferences and judgments and inferences that you draw afterwards just aren’t necessarily true, no matter how dogmatically you may assert them.
