[quote=flyer]I realize others have stated they disagree, but, personally, I see bs and chaos on both sides. The few times I’ve tuned in to listen to either party speak, I’ve heard raving, ranting and promises made that only a fool would believe could actually be accomplished in reality–given the involvement of the three branches of government–vs. a monarchy–which the candidates appear to believe exists in the US.
Pandering to the masses has become an art form in this election beyond anything I’ve ever seen in my lifetime, and those who are being duped into voting for, what will most likely be proven to be empty promises, will become the victims of their own ignorance. That said, everyone is certainly free to believe whatever they want to believe.[/quote]
Campaign rhetoric isn’t chaos. Candidates state their positions. Things they want to do. Some are interpreted as promises. Other than tea baggers, nobody holds candidates responsible when they try to turn their agendas into law and fail because they can’t get support for those agendas. There has been no chaos on the dem side. There isn’t even any subjectivity in that assertion. The word has a very specific meaning. As presidential campaigns go, there hasn’t even been much in the way of BS.