Menu

Home › Forums › Housing › Free home anyone? The Utah court ruled, and this cat just got himself a free casa › Eugene wrote:SK in CV wrote:

January 17, 2011 at 6:34 PM #655790
SK in CV
Participant

[quote=Eugene][quote=SK in CV] But the article pretty clearly states that in these cases that MERS was not listed as the beneficiary, only that MERS was “another entity listed on the trust deed”.[/quote]

Here’s a sample MERS trust deed

http://www.mersinc.org/filedownload.aspx?id=215&table=ProductFile

MERS is explicitly named as one of the beneficiaries.[/quote]

Yeah. Except that only an example of…

And a california example.

The article specifically states that in these cases MERS is NOT the bene.