@Borat Here’s the Source Watch entry about junkscience.com, as well as the background about it’s creator, Steven J. Milloy.
Humm, proof by character assassination.. good!!! real science there!! That reference does not prove whether what he has said is correct or incorrect. It only tries to impugn the author. This is not how science is done!!
@drunkle In addition, any scientist would know that doing all your references from one site, a blog no less (realclimate.org) would get you laughed out of the scientific community.
and yet you point to junkscience? huh?
I don’t use him as sole source, and if you had paid attention I pointed out that he refers to other sources in support of his contention, while realclimate.org doesn’t!. In fact, using your reference (http://www.junkscience.com/Greenhouse/Cosmic_rays_and_climate.html), within the first paragraph, junkscience.com/Milloy has referenced at least 6 background articles (both pro and con to his position). This is how real science articles are written. Personally, I do not support all that Milloy states, but the method he uses is actually scientifically sound, while the method that realclimate.org uses is not scientifically sound.
