[quote=bearishgurl][quote=SK in CV]JFC. Trump has never denied that he called her what he was accused of calling her. Logically, we can stipulate that he did it. Only someone incapable of logic would dispute that. That really is the whole story. None of the rest is the least bit important.[/quote]He didn’t specifically deny it because the whole allegation blindsided him during the debate. He deals with so many people every day that he probably had to take time later, after the debate, to think back that far to try to remember the person better and what all went down between them. Fortunately, much of Trump’s life has been covered by the media.[/quote]
He STILL hasn’t denied it. He did it. The evidence is overwhelming he’s done it. He’s said dozens of similar things about other women. There is a pattern.
[quote=bearishgurl]
[quote=SK in CV]You have no evidence that she gained 65 lbs or any other amount of weight. She said it was 19 lbs. That you think it’s meaningful is disgusting.[/quote]The different numbers on the web for her weight after being crowned Miss U were 160, 165 and 170. I don’t know which one was correct.[/quote]
Yes, you don’t know. So we can stipulate that it’s just as likely that she gained 19 lbs as she said as it is any other number.
[quote=bearishgurl]
[quote=SK in CV]She has no reason to deny she had eating disorders. Are you blaming a young woman for eating disorders now?[/quote]Yes, I’m blaming her because she did not seek treatment and entered the pageant knowing she had a grave disorder which very well could have prevented her from fulfilling her duties should she win. Gaining too much weight (especially drastically yo-yo-ing with one’s weight) is inimical to holding the position of Miss Universe . . . or the post of any organized pageant winner, for that matter.[/quote]
Do you also blame people for having depression bipolar disorder or any other mental disorder?
[quote=bearishgurl]
[quote=SK in CV]You have a problem with Latinas, obviously. Clinton doesn’t need to use her as a token anything. You’re a liar about her getting paid. There is zero evidence that is true, yet you continue to smear this woman who is guilty of nothing but being humiliated by your candidate.
Your disdain for women and Latinas is abhorrent, as is your support for a racist fascist.[/quote]Sorry you feel that way. Once again, you are insulting me without even knowing me. You don’t know me, my family members or friends. You have no idea who the h@ll I’m associated with on a daily, weekly and monthly basis. In some ways, I hope you don’t go off the deep end if this election doesn’t turn out as you hope it will. You seem to have a lot riding on the outcome …. to the point where everyone who posts here actually stating they will vote for someone who is not your candidate is your enemy and needs to be verbally cut down and insulted and you’re just the poster to do that. I feel a little sorry for you, SK.
Again, Machado claims she was “humiliated” 20 years ago by DJT, yet when CNN’s Cooper brought up her criminal behavior 10-15 years ago, she stated that was too long ago and so essentially she shouldn’t be judged on it today and that her life is “clear” now. She also reminded Cooper that she had been Miss Universe 20 years ago and she no longer holds that title (implying that this portion of her life was dead and buried). Yet, she came up with these made-up comments from Trump 20 years ago as if she has been emotionally damaged from them all of her life. She isn’t the least bit credible.
I think you would have to agree that her statute of limitations for bringing these accusations forward (well-timed by the Clinton campaign 5 weeks before the general election) has long ago expired.
[/quote]
I’m insulting you based on the exact words you’ve said here. If they’re not representative of you, then you’ve had ample chance to change your opinions. You haven’t. You’ve just dug in.
There was no criminal behavior. Nor is it the least bit pertinent. (Maybe you can explain why it should be pertinent?) Again, you’re blaming her for Trump humiliating her. And you’re calling her a liar, absent a single shred of evidence that she’s lied. Yet you have no problem voting for someone that fact checkers, in some cases, have found that he lies more often than telling the truth.
Trump is running for President. You’re holding shit against Clinton that happened 20 years ago and longer. Yet you think stuff that Trump did during the same period isn’t important?
And this is personal to me. Trump is unquestionably the most dangerous presidential candidate from a major party in 3 generations at least. Thankfully, he has almost no chance of winning.
