“1. Raise the age however high is needed. 72, 74, whatever.
2. Regardless of age, it should be needs-based only. Stop giving people the expectation that they can live off the government comfortably in their old age as an entitlement.
Better?”
Thanks PG, that is definitely more clear. I like the “needs-based” concept, but isn’t that just stealing from the wealthy again? You know our conservative comrads here despise income redistribution. Maybe they would make an exception in this case? I think it would be an easier sell than a cap-less payroll tax.
