Home › Forums › Closed Forums › Properties or Areas › More bloodbatch in 4closure ranch.
- This topic has 18 replies, 12 voices, and was last updated 17 years, 7 months ago by SD Realtor.
-
AuthorPosts
-
April 27, 2007 at 7:31 AM #8939April 27, 2007 at 7:36 AM #51263CritterParticipant
Does anyone know what difference a cash offer makes to the escrow process? Does it speed it up?
Why would a bank approval be necessary with a cash offer?
April 27, 2007 at 7:38 AM #51264tech_junkieParticipantFor a short sale, I don’t know. It’s new to me. But I’ll find out.
April 27, 2007 at 7:49 AM #51266hipmattParticipantI don’t know if your buddy should be bragging about his deal here.. he saved a whole 10% off peak prices just a year and a half into the (probably largest RE) crash in a place you call 4closure ranch. Surely this trend is just starting.
April 27, 2007 at 8:04 AM #51268tech_junkieParticipantI don't know if your buddy should be bragging about his deal here.. he saved a whole 10% off peak prices just a year and a half into the (probably largest RE) crash in a place you call 4closure ranch. Surely this trend is just starting.
He's wasn't bragging about the deal. He "needs" a home for his family, doesn't want to rent for $2500/month, and isn't cash strapped with a mortgage. He merely asked me for my opinion (of which I told him the hemmorage is just starting). He was more surprised about these screwed sellers would let things get out of hand like this. Like I said, he's probably going to back out of the deal because (1) he wants a home soon (2) doesn't want to wait for the bank approval process for a short sale (they are telling him it will be weeks) (3) doesn't think 4sranch is a good area in hindsight. I think he has his eyes on Carmel Valley now.
April 27, 2007 at 8:39 AM #51275no_such_realityParticipantHe “needs” a home for his family, doesn’t want to rent for $2500/month
Um, $920,000 earning 8% at a 40% tax bracket leaves $44,000 after taxes.
Rent at $2500/month only requires $30,000.
A 6% mortgage on $920K after taxes runs about $5000/month when property tax and mellow roos are include.
If he need a home, there’s a slew of them to rent.
April 27, 2007 at 9:32 AM #51276gnParticipant“Apparently he said it wasn’t that hard to negotiate with these folks in 4closure ranch”
This is because, in a short sale situation, the seller just want to walk away from the property. Effectively, it’s the lender that’s deciding whether to accept the offer.
Currently, most sellers in 4S (who are not in financial trouble) are still in denial about the value of their properties. This is not surprising. The builders know this and are using this fact to undercut the resellers by offering lower prices.
April 27, 2007 at 9:55 AM #51278debshultzParticipantdebs
Of course it was not difficult to negotiate…The bank will probadly fall all over themselves to approve this one. Yikes!
April 27, 2007 at 9:57 AM #51280no_such_realityParticipantThe builders know this and are using this fact to undercut the resellers by offering lower prices.
Actually, the builders are using it to get much higher prices for their smaller build out.
A home that is 15-20% below resales looks like a deal. When resales come down 15% to match, the builder will move another 15% down.
Rinse, repeat.
April 27, 2007 at 2:13 PM #51299AnonymousGuestI am surprised that anyone reading the articles on this site would consider buying now or anytime soon. I realize that I am handicapped being a CPA so I place most emphasis on the financial side of the transaction. However, it is pretty obvious that the housing market in San Diego is going down for the forseeable future so your investment is/will be shrinking. Unless you can afford a six figure loss or can wait 10 or more years, you are taking a huge risk with your financial future if you have to sell when the market is down. In the 1990’s the San Diego market went down steadily for 7 years and we have a much bigger bubble this time.
My second point is that if you are considering rent vs. buy consider the entire amount you are paying out in a purchase situation. First, your house interest payment is $500 a month per $100,000 of principal at 6%. Most people will wind up paying more interest; 7% is almost $600 per month. After this you have property taxes, insurance, HOA fees, maintenance, etc. Consequently, a $500,000 home will cost you at least $3,000 a month. There is a tax deduction for the interest and taxes, but for most people this is less than 20% of what you pay out. For those of you buying larger houses there is the AMT (alternative minimum tax)to worry about if Congress “forgets” to approve their annual correction. So if you are optimistic use $500 a month per $100,000 for the after tax REAL cost of any purchase (regardless of how you finance it) when comparing rent vs. buy. Consequently a $920,000 home will have a REAL cost of at least $4,600 a month and you take the risk of a reduction in the home’s value because it isn’t going up anytime soon.
April 27, 2007 at 2:28 PM #51303lnilesParticipant$1.05M may not be accurate because of the scandalous “cash-back” deals which are happening quite often. Sometimes the seller gives back tons of cash as part of the agreement after the sale closes. I’ve seen it for up to 9% of the closing price (a home lists as being sold for $700k but the seller gave back $60k so actually it sold for $640k). Just because the records say that place closed for $1.05M doesn’t mean it actually did. I wouldn’t be surprised if they actually got it for around $900k. Please tell your friend to ask to see the previous sales contract before he buys based on the assumption he’s getting a deal by comparison.
April 27, 2007 at 2:35 PM #51305temeculaguyParticipant$2500 a month rent or 920k purchase is so far out of whack I can’t even criticize it for fear of violating the persons with disablities act. Using those numbers a 460k house would rent for $1250 and a 300k condo would rent for $800. If 300k condos rented for $800, nobody would buy them, I don’t mean less people I mean not a single one.
If someone wants to throw down almost a mil for what they can rent for 2500, have at it and could the bartender please me whatever that person is drinking.
April 27, 2007 at 4:40 PM #51318SD RealtorParticipantCritter –
Yes a cash deal is always faster because there is no financing involved. Buyer does not need to have a loan application, no underwriting, no loan approval… etc…. no loan contingency best of all.
In a short sale the lender has final approval no matter what sort of financing or cash the buyer is using because the lender is eating the difference between the loan amount and the sale price.
SD Realtor
April 27, 2007 at 7:21 PM #51330LookoutBelowParticipantHe Could have done much better in 6 months to a year later….
April 28, 2007 at 3:36 PM #51379gnParticipantSD Realtor,
“Yes a cash deal is always faster because there is no financing involved”
In a typical (i.e. non-short sale) situation, when a buyer makes an all cash offer, what kind of discount (i.e. under the market value) can he expect (since an all-cash offer is a very strong offer) ?
-
AuthorPosts
- The forum ‘Properties or Areas’ is closed to new topics and replies.