I just put in my request to my boss to see if I could be furlowed on Friday or Monday to save the company money. He didn’t understand why. I explained it to him. He still didn’t believe it. I explained it to him again. He then submitted my request to SMt and requested to be furlowed himself one day. His argument is not every SMT needs to be working 5 days. We will see what happens. I wouldn’t be surprised if every SMT ends up furlowing themselves for one day. There’s roughly 5-6 SMTs in CA, and they could alternate their furlow day so there is at is only 1 less SMT each day…. That’s around a $6000/week cost savings right there. For a big company, this isn’t a lot. For a small company, these small cost savings add up and could make a big difference if a customer continues to defer purchases or payments. No lease + 6000/month cost savings with very little hit to productivity at just one office location.
.. I’m such a troublemaker.

I do need to spend some time looking for replacement work…someone who would hire me exactly 1 day per week, paying me what I make for that 1 day/week for work.. um, ok I’ll try and ask. Wish me luck. lol. For the rest of my time during that furlow day, I’ll be restoring my cars. I have a $1050 budget for it, more than I originally had.lol.

Hey, SMT did ask people for ways to save the company money…This is one way. I’m a problem solver, and they paid me to think of solutions when problems arise.

Weren’t we taking about on another thread about taking a mortgage forbearance to save cash?

This is even better. Paid more to not work….To conserve company cash while not impacting workers…$4200/month of pay for not working for up to 39 weeks, assuming it doesn’t get extended which it most likely will.

Maybe some have it right. Maybe others should pay more taxes so some of us can get paid more for not working..Maybe I’ll vote for Harris after all, lol.