Just because a woman is seductive or flirtatious doesn’t mean she wants sex.
[/quote]
I didn’t say it did. There are all different kinds of signals a person can give. Flirtatious, seductive, and “I want sex” are three different signals. And of course there are a million shades of gray within and between all these signals. And the same type of signals from one woman might mean something different from what they mean coming from another woman. That’s why I went on about the semaphore flags. To make it clear that I was talking about an unusually clear, unambiguous, overt set of signals, and not flirtation or a generally seductive demeanor.
[quote=FlyerInHi]
And why can a man not resist? There are so many other choices, why risk sex with someone in the company/enterprise?
[/quote]
That misses the point. A man can (should be able to, usually is able to) resist. But should he be required to? Most people spend a very large percentage of their time around people who are in the same field as them. So a man in power is required to avoid advances toward any woman in his field? That’s not a small thing.
[quote=FlyerInHi]
I also think your questions make you old fashioned. You imply that women can be distracting and tempting and men cannot resist.
[/quote]
I imply no such thing. I’m asking if they should be required to resist or risk their career.
[quote=FlyerInHi]
Like if a woman is wearing a mini skirt, she’s giving the signals.
[/quote]
Again, there are many different signals. And wearing a mini skirt is not an “I want to have sex” signal. It’s not much of a signal at all, really.
