1. The subtitle to your video says:
“Uploaded on Sep 27, 2008: NYC Wall St. Bailout Protest 25 September 2008 – 500+ out to say ‘no’ to Bush’s $700B bailout plan”
There may be 1500 people there.
Your words: “As I’ve pointed out earlier, there were protests in 2008 that got absolutely zero news coverage. Thousands of people in the street”.
“I specifically called out the fact that it was not being discussed in the media back in 2008.”
My very simple question to you (2nd time): Were there other protests with thousands in the streets? Or was that the only one?
If so, I already showed you where it was covered by CNN. If there were more please enlighten me.
2. This is fucking amazing. I’m very aware of the leanings of the editorial pages of both papers. I haven’t referred to the editorial pages of either. That has nothing to do with their news reporting. Are you seriously telling me you don’t understand the difference? A freshman who has taken 2 or 3 days of Journalism 101 knows more about reporting that you do. No wonder you think the news is biased. smh
3.“There was no reason to lower rates” Because you say so?
4. The DNC isn’t part of the government? What you want is not in the best interest of this country.
5. “I was actively involved in the presidential campaign, so knew what was going on”. Great. I was actively involved in putting a man on the moon. Prove it.
6. I state again – “Prove that corps had more say than pols.” And again -“corporations are the ones who wrote most of the trade agreement” Prove it.
7. I’m going to reference this every time you post. You have one last chance to look into what was actually passed and admit that you have no idea what you are talking about.
8. There was no “anti free speech bill” passed. ZH is guilty of sloppy “reporting”.
Your sources and links are garbage. I don’t have to prove that the news and editorial pages of a good paper are protected by an ethical firewall. I don’t have to prove to you that Russia hacked the DNC. I don’t have to prove to you that 2+2=4. You do need to provide evidence for your kooky claims.
(This will now be the second post where I have clearly called you out as having no evidence)