There seem to be problems with the data in general. There’s evidence that NASA went back and modified the data after the fact. That’s something you should never do in a scientific process. Sure it’s fine apply adjustments to the data in a particular study but you should never change the underlying data. Are they just trying to fit the data to their wrong model or is there something actually wrong with the collection of the data.
To what lengths are you willing to go to prevent or reduce CO2 emission. It seems like you’d have to being willing to go to war in order to force major global reductions in fossil fuel usage.
[/quote]
What lengths? I don’t know. That’s a separate issue. As long as there are people in power denying climate change, we can’t even get to that question.