Yes, I did post about those things in another thread about 2 years ago.
i lived here first and bought the easement from the previous owner of the lot the trouble maker is on. Lawyers say no risk of successful adverse possession. I think the title company is on the hook for post insurance adverse possession. We don’t have that problem though. I have tons of documentation, police reports, photos , a few witnesses etc.

The rights of the dominant and servient tenement are legally pretty clear. I have consulted with attorneys on that too, a really good one but not a litigator. That was a while back. I have plenty of rights. This is just your basic belligerent obstructionist behavior…lawyer defined him as so rogue that the judge might make a ruling on the complaint alone. Others say his lawyer will bring it to a settlement quickly, but a an unreasonable person can be lead to keep fighting by a greedy lawyer too. But my question for now is, why a quiet title action? That’s an expensive add on. I am worried about lawyers blowing up the scope. I would like to hear about it from knowledgeable people who are not asking me for a large deposit. Maybe I should jut pay an hour to have someone explain it to me.

I understand that nobody on Piggington’s intends legal advice and I won’t construe any thing here as that.