[quote=Blogstar]The twist on polygamy . . . seems trollish too.[/quote]

I thought about this thread (can’t believe it was almost two years ago) when I saw this article: http://news.yahoo.com/sister-wives-cite-gay-marriage-ruling-polygamy-case-182116740.html

I wasn’t being trollish – it appears that I was simply expecting the next logical step in the analysis. If marriage is no longer a union between one man and one woman, why can’t it be between one woman and two men (making a ridiculous hypothetical here :), 5 people of varying levels of gender identification, etc.? And I raise this point because I am a lawyer and I find legal developments interesting, not because I am expressing any viewpoint.