[quote=flu][quote=dumbrenter]
So your kid gets vaccinated against measles, but there is still a chance to get infected with measles and to prevent that you want to get everybody around you to be poked by a needle.
By the same logic, if your neighbor’s kid is allergic to nuts, we should ban them from your neighborhood or even the whole county just to be sure. Because we don’t want kids to suffer, either from measles or allergies.[/quote]

Have you been to an elementary school in CarmelV lately?

Ever heard of “peanut free zone”?

Lunch tables designated nut-free tables and classrooms with kids that have a nut allergy have designed precautions taken, including restrictions food/etc during class/holiday events.

A woman’s right to choose has no impact on the health/well being of everyone else around them.[/quote]

Am trying to make sense of your words…. My point was that if everybody has to be forced to do something for zk’s kid to be prevented from measles, the same should apply for allergies and maybe some other items too.
Not sure what this has to do with school tables? Are you suggesting that kids who do not get vaccinated be separated from the kids who do? If not, your questions about carmelV (assuming you meant carmel valley) makes no sense and I’m not sure why you are asking me if I have ever been to elementary schools in carmelV.

A woman’s right to choose DOES have an impact on my future well-being in terms of future tax receipts and my social security payments. Let’s be honest about how the right to choose is affecting the demographics. My comparison was that while we are at poking people whether they like it or not, how about doing the same the right to choose?