[quote=mike92104][quote=SK in CV][quote=mike92104]
Thanks for the clearly unbiased source of information.[/quote]

If you have any data that disputes anything presented, have at it. Otherwise, that’s a horrendously ignorant ad hominem argument.[/quote]

I’m sorry, are you saying that the Huffington Post isn’t biased towards left leaning ideals? That sounds like ignorance to me.[/quote]

No, I’m saying that arguing that the source is biased without a shred of evidence that any of the data presented is inaccurate is not really an argument. Show me bias the article quoted. Show me inaccuracies.

I could make the exact same argument against the article paramount posted from the Harvard Review. It was written by two guys that are bought and paid for by the gun industry. I didn’t do it, because I have no interest in researching all the errors in it. I read the first couple pages and it was clear, it wasn’t a peer reviewed study and was written with a clear bias. I’m not going to argue it here, it’s not worth my time. So I didn’t even respond to it.