[quote=CA renter]
I did bring honest data. Please link your source so we can dissect it more. The public school number you’ve posted probably includes some major infrastructure and interest on bond payments, among many other indirect costs. [/quote]
Those would be the real costs. What you brought is a school talking point.
If I buy a bunch of stuff on a credit card and then pay interest on the credit card, that’s all the cost of getting the stuff.
That’s how the government and schools are hiding their spending. Bonds, “infrastructure”, etc. It’s all the REAL spending that is being done on schools and in many districts, it’s being going on for decades.
The number he brings is the same way I reached the LAUSD number, and the same way you get to the fact that California doesn’t spend $100B a year at a state level, we’ve been spending over $200B
You go look up ALL the money being spent in the four different budget presentations.
You’ve lost all credibility with me since you can’t admit that the Union IS part of the problem. In LAUSD they managed to get a contract that the termination is so biased and so difficult that the administration just puts probelm, and by problem we mean things like molesting students, in a non-teaching, non-working office cube and pays them out until retirement because in the end, It’s less expensive.
That is a problem and creates a completely unaccountable environment. Why not, maybe it has to do ith the 3 person panel of peers, one picked by the union, one by the teacher, and one by administration.
