I feel stuck between the problem of Homophobia and the problem of Homoagenda. My kids are learning the basic homophobic stuff at school, which we mitigate, but I don’t want the opposite extreme where the homosexuality is “great and normal message”, is being stealthily incorporated into their lives from political angles.

A person should not be trashed, as is happening on this thread,for disagreeing with that message because the message is rooted in emotional claims.There is a lot of evidence, pro and con, about how normal and great homosexuality is or not.

That’s different than saying there are a lot of great homosexuals, which or course there are. While I think potential for crossing over is very human,I think to some extent, and in many cases blatantly, gays were indoctrinated into their orientation and I do not want to willfully expand that system of indoctrination.

I would not object to teaching Gay civil rights History” but I would mitigate the agenda to change minds on the issue of homosexuality as much as the formal or informal one that promotes homophobia.

Of course now I will be called homophobic. The term, when overused is the same type of tool as “anti-semtic” or “uncle tom” or “nigger lover”.

I also don’t go along with the “cooties” thing and other stuff that nurtures gender riffs at the personal or societal level. How many ways do we want to be divided and conquered?

For those who hate poor people,forgive my poor writing skills. I am a high school drop out, but it has nothing to do with the silver spoon that was in my mouth when I was born.