[quote=urbanrealtor][quote=SD Realtor]
There are the common double ended deals as well which are simply cases of agents being greedy and shielding or holding back offers.

It all kind of sucks. There is nothing preventing you from trying to find someone in distress and work out a deal with them. It is simply alot of time and effort and much harder and time consuming then it sound.

….

As we have discussed over and over the problem is the process. Regardless of whether it is a short sale or an reo, the dual agency problem is always going to be there.

…
It would be nice is there were some simple parameters added to the process. Simplistic ideas such as minimum advertising durations of say x number of days before an offer could be accepted in the case of an REO would be nice. Also in the case of multiple offers, the (pick a number) say 3 highest and best offers could all be submitted to the Asset manager with the realtors recommendation for which one to accept.

For short sales things get a bit more blurry because the damned processing time of the lender makes it harder. However something like the above suggestion for reos would go a long long way towards helping things out. Simply outlawing dual agency would not hurt either. Buyers may whine that they would rather keep the commission then have some agent they didn’t want representing them but there can be ways to work that out.

The MLS is simply an advertising tool. Realtors in fact are not required to use it and they can get a waiver signed by homeowners who do not want the home on the MLS and submit that waiver and the listing doesn’t have to go on the MLS. Saying the MLS is the problem is an ignorant statement.

The problem is that there are fundamental problems in the way short sales and reos MAY be handled. There are enough potential problems there that these types of sales need to have increased transparency and/or regulatory control.

…
[/quote]

Well put.
Amen brother.[/quote]

I’m presently “swamped” but concur with this entire post, SDR.