[quote=ucodegen]
I was trying to avoid being inflammatory. There are actually 2 possibilities. One is your example of “Everything will be provided for, but nothing will be available.” and the other of being taxed to death to maintain status-quo in the current care level.
[/quote]

Switzerland, which has a system the most similar to the proposed reform, has neither one of those problems.

[quote=ucodegen]
And/or a constitutional challenge. The end run that was done to pass it, contradicts constitutional provisions to prevent “abuse of majority”. The ability to filibuster provides a mechanism to prevent “abuse of majority”.
[/quote]

The Senate bill, that contains 99.9% of the reform, had 60 votes in the Senate and majority in the house. The only thing you can argue about is reconsilation fixes.